Lacson v. United States Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court has jurisdiction to review an order where § 46110(a) “specifically addresse[d] the type of order at issue” in the case
• holding that an agency could rely on hearsay to support its decision
• noting that in an APA case, “determining the facts is generally the agency’s responsibility, not” the court’s
• explaining that ad- ministrative agencies may consider hearsay evidence only if it has “satisfactory indicia of reliability” and is “trustworthy”
• discussing grant of exclusive jurisdiction to the courts of appeals to review orders issued by the TSA under § 114(r)
• noting, in an APA case, that “determining the facts is generally the agency’s responsibility, not ours”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).