Skip to main content
· 7/23/2013

Earle Partington v. James Houck

Citations

  • 406 U.S. App. D.C. 257
  • 723 F.3d 280
  • 2013 WL 3799867
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “statutory definition of ‘agency’ is not entirely clear”
  • “we do not substitute our judgment for that of the agency or evaluate de novo” its factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Kavanaugh, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.