· 7/23/2013
Earle Partington v. James Houck
Citations
- 406 U.S. App. D.C. 257
- 723 F.3d 280
- 2013 WL 3799867
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “statutory definition of ‘agency’ is not entirely clear”
- “we do not substitute our judgment for that of the agency or evaluate de novo” its factual findings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Kavanaugh, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.