Skip to main content
· 4/21/1995

National Treasury Employees Union v. Ricki Helfer, Chair, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Citations

  • 53 F.3d 1289
  • 311 U.S. App. D.C. 325
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9033
  • 1995 WL 232111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of Appellants’ motion to amend the complaint because the new claims “bore ‘only tangential relationship’ to the original claim”
  • affirming denial of Appellants’ motion to amend the complaint because the new claims “bore ‘only tangential relationship’ to the original claim”
  • affirming denial where the amendment “bore only [a] tangential relationship to the original claim” and did not prejudice the plaintiff because the plaintiff “can file [the amendment as] an independent challenge”
  • affirming denial where the amendment \bore only [a] tangential relationship to the original claim\ and did not prejudice the plaintiff because the plaintiff \can file [the amendment as] an independent challenge\
  • “[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the amendment, which bore ‘only tangential relationship’ to the original claim.”
  • \The 'scope of review under the \arbitrary and capricious\ standard is narrow and a court is not to substitute its judgment for that of the agency.' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Randolph, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.