Court of Appeals of Texas· 3/8/1979
Eans v. Grocer Supply Co., Inc.
Citations
- 580 S.W.2d 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding circumstantial evidence was sufficient for jury to have concluded corporation procured prosecution where reporting persons failed to disclose material facts favorable to accused
- holding circumstantial evidence was sufficient for jury to have concluded corporation procured prosecution where reporting persons failed to disclose material facts favorable to accused
- failure to make material exculpatory information known to the police could be evidence of a hostile motive or insufficient grounds
- causation is a particularly apt question for the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Evans, Warren, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richey v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 229×
- Adams v. Petrade International, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-03-17· cited 184×
- Akin v. DahlTexas Supreme Court· 1983-10-05· cited 152×
- Marin Real Estate Partners, L.P. v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2011-11-23· cited 117×
- Marathon Oil Co. v. SalazarTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1984-11-15· cited 93×
- Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1994-10-18· cited 65×
- IBP, Inc. v. KlumpeTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-11-16· cited 60×
- Digby v. Texas BankTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1997-04-23· cited 44×
- Compton v. CalabriaTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-05-13· cited 39×
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. AltusTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1986-02-20· cited 38×
- Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. OrtizTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1988-06-16· cited 33×
- Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. LieckTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-02-11· cited 24×
- Tranum v. BroadwayTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-07-02· cited 21×
- Dahl v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-29· cited 20×
- Ellis County State Bank v. KeeverTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1992-12-16· cited 16×
- City of Houston v. StoddardTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1984-07-05· cited 13×
- Brookshire Grocery Co. v. RicheyTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1995-06-14· cited 12×
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. ChaffinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-07-19· cited 9×
- Chandler v. United StatesN.D. Texas· 1994-08-22· cited 4×
- IBP, Inc. v. Klumpe, Steven M., Jeff Blackburn, Sam Fadduol, Kevin Glasheen, and Fadduol & Glasheen, P.C., Attorneys at LawTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-11-16
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Douglass v. Panama, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1974-01-09· cited 138×
- Green v. RudsenskeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1959-01-07· cited 66×
- JC Penney Company v. GilfordCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1967-11-30· cited 49×
- Biering v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court· 1888-01-31· cited 45×
- Hammond v. StricklenCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-08-02· cited 40×
- Ada Oil Company v. DillaberryCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-04-09· cited 35×
- Green v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-08-21· cited 32×
- Clark v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-03-29· cited 19×
- Monesson v. Champion International Corp., Del-Mar DivisionCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-12-02· cited 15×
- Dallas Transit Company v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1964-05-29· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.