Eanes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It was incumbent upon the State to prove that such exhibit was a forgery and that appellant was connected with it.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carrillo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-19· cited 254×
• Harrell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-21· cited 188×
• Turner v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-05-18· cited 95×
• Boney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-09-27· cited 71×
• McCann v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-22· cited 70×
• Ward v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-06· cited 32×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-03-05· cited 21×
• Morrison v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-11-18· cited 18×
• Rice v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 15×
• McElroy v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1984-01-23· cited 14×
• Ellis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-24· cited 10×
• People v. Fernandez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1984-04-19· cited 8×
• Ingham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-19· cited 3×
• Tubbs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-01· cited 3×
• Espinoza v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-01-20· cited 1×
• Espinoza v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-11-17· cited 1×
• Grundstrom v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-06-10· cited 1×
• Scott Eugene Sorrells v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-11-06
• Jeffrey Jerome Washington v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-10-16
• Santhy Inthalangsy v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2020-09-24