D. South Carolina· 3/31/2009
Eady v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.
Citations
- 609 F. Supp. 2d 540
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The non-discrimination language in the defendant’s Handbook will not sustain the plaintiff’s cause of action for breach of contract.”
- “The failure of a party to address an issue raised in summary judgment may be considered a waiver or abandonment of the relevant cause of action.”
- “The failure of a party to address an issue raised in summary judgment may be considered a waiver or abandonment of the relevant cause of action.”
- “The failure of a party to address an issue raised in summary judgment may be considered a waiver or abandonment of the relevant cause of action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: C. Weston Houck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Propst v. HWS Co.W.D. North Carolina· 2015-12-07· cited 20×
- Benedict v. Hankook Tire Co. Ltd.E.D. Virginia· 2018-02-06· cited 9×
- Gleaton v. Monumental Life InsuranceD. South Carolina· 2010-01-28· cited 8×
- Langley v. Dolgencorp, LLCD. South Carolina· 2013-09-13· cited 7×
- Brailsford v. Wateree Community Action, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2015-09-25· cited 4×
- Johns v. Amtrust Underwriters, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2014-01-27· cited 2×
- Delta Frangible Ammunition, LLC v. Sinterfire, Inc.W.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-09-30
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 4,775×
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyFourth Circuit· 1996-04-05· cited 1,812×
- Beale v. HardyFourth Circuit· 1985-08-07· cited 1,011×
- Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestFourth Circuit· 1993-07-22· cited 941×
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1987-07-22· cited 884×
- Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1993-12-22· cited 839×
- Love-Lane v. MartinFourth Circuit· 2004-01-22· cited 785×
- Joan M. Ennis v. The National Association of Business and Educational Radio, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 1995-05-15· cited 418×
- Sharon Temkin Bruce M. Temkin v. Frederick County Commissioners Glen Marion Selby, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1991-09-12· cited 413×
- Aaron C. James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 2004-05-14· cited 379×
- James B. BRISTOW, Appellee, v. the DAILY PRESS, INC., Appellant. James B. BRISTOW, Appellant, v. the DAILY PRESS, INC., AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1985-08-22· cited 336×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.