Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff must allege, among other things, facts to show that she was replaced by a substantially younger worker
• holding that Proud inference applies where supervi- sor does not initially hire employee but laterally transfers employee to new position and shortly thereafter terminates employee
• acknowledging that the burden shifting scheme of McDonnell Douglas applies equally to Title VII cases involving claims of age or race discrimination
• explaining that to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA, plaintiff must prove that she: (1) was protected by the ADEA; (2) suffered an adverse employment action; (3
• stating in age discrimination case that “[a]lthough the proof scheme is staged with shifting burdens, such discrimination cases may nevertheless be evaluated under established summary judgment principles”
• stating in age discrimination case that “[a]lthough the proof scheme is staged with shifting burdens, such discrimination cases may nevertheless be evaluated under established summary judgment principles”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).