· 3/17/1982
E & M MacHine Tool Corp. v. Continental MacHine Products, Inc.
Citations
- 316 N.W.2d 900
- 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 84
- 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “For purposes of the special appearance, we assume that the plaintiff’s allegations on the merits are true.”
- defendant did not waive its special appearance by making motion to quash where motion in substance merely objected to plaintiff’s discovery requests and did not manifest any purpose to invoke court’s authority on any issue other than special appearance proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reynoldson, Legrand, Uhlenhopp, McCormick, McGiverin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.