E & E Enterprises Global, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an action brought in the United States Court of Federal Claims under the CDA must be based on the same claim presented to the contracting officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nova group/tutor-saliba v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-03-16· cited 5×
• Securiforce International America, LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-03-21· cited 3×
• Bruhn Newtech, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-12-02· cited 3×
• Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-02-28· cited 3×
• Walsh Construction Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-05-31· cited 3×
• Securiforce International America, LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-04-12
• Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-12-29
• E & E Enterprises Global, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-08-28
• Rma Engineering S.A.R.L v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2018-08-29

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Harlow v. Fitzgerald
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
• Scheuer v. Rhodes
  Supreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
• Papasan v. Allain
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
• McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 4,144×
• Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service
  Federal Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 1,960×
• Fisher v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2005-03-09· cited 1,462×
• John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1991-05-15· cited 542×
• Daniel A. Lindsay v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2002-06-27· cited 428×
• Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)
  Federal Circuit· 2002-03-26· cited 326×
• Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1998-11-24· cited 299×
• Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1989-03-15· cited 272×
• Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1987-02-12· cited 249×
• Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2010-02-19· cited 246×
• Centex Corp. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2005-01-19· cited 238×
• Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1993-05-13· cited 238×
• James M. Ellett Construction Company, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1996-08-26· cited 235×
• Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1987-09-09· cited 230×
• Atlas Corp. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1990-02-02· cited 204×

Other cases named E & E Enterprises Global, Inc. v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• E & E Enterprises Global, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-08-28