Durrence v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court cannot determine the propriety of the trial court’s ruling without a proffer of the excluded evidence or testimony.”
• defendant voluntarily went to DFCS office where interview took place

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marlow v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-04-22· cited 9×
• Anguiano v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-12-28· cited 6×
• Guillermo Martinez-Gaspar v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-04-17

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Jackson v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
• Humphreys v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-15· cited 98×
• SOSNIAK v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-06-07· cited 61×
• Lindsey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-09-24· cited 55×
• Hendrix v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-12-09· cited 48×
• Leatherwood v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-03-09· cited 26×
• Baird v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-03-28· cited 26×
• McAllister v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-11-23· cited 25×
• State v. Folsom
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-02-09· cited 23×
• Warner v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-03-26· cited 21×
• Axelburg v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-10-31· cited 16×
• Bearfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-08· cited 15×
• Cantu v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-06-28· cited 10×
• Courrier v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-23· cited 9×