Durning v. Balent/Kurdilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that award of shared physical custody of school-aged child of parents who do not live in geographical proximity to each other is contrary to child’s need for continuity at home and at school
• explaining that award of shared physical custody of school-aged child of parents who do not live in geographical proximity to each other is contrary to child’s need for continuity at home and at school
• declining to find waiver as a result of mother’s (Footnote Continued) 1925(b) order is missing, “the appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 1925(b
• addressing merits of appellant’s issues, which “were raised, or fairly suggested by, issues raised in [appellant’s] concise statement[.]”
• addressing merits of appellant’s issues, which “were raised, or fairly suggested by, issues raised in [appellant’s] concise statement”
• finding issues raised in Rule 1925(b) statement, but not raised in appellate brief waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).