Durlacher v. Hoffschneider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “claim” in that case was defined as “a written demand by a third party for monetary damages, including the institution of suit or a demand for arbitration.”
• finding unpersuasive the “attempt to intertwine the [claims] by relying on naked allegations in the original complaints that they represent mere pieces of a larger ‘scheme’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).