· 8/23/2006
Image Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co.
Citations
- 459 F.3d 1044
- 79 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1942
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21491
- 2006 WL 2424782
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
- holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
- holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
- holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
- holding that the rule announced in Ansari is not jurisdictional but “one of venue which the parties . . . waived by not raising the issue before the district court.”
- recognizing that “the FAA does not itself confer subject matter jurisdiction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Ebel, McConnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.