Skip to main content
· 8/23/2006

Image Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co.

Citations

  • 459 F.3d 1044
  • 79 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1942
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21491
  • 2006 WL 2424782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
  • holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
  • holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
  • holding that courts may sua sponte examine their own jurisdiction at any stage in a proceeding
  • holding that the rule announced in Ansari is not jurisdictional but “one of venue which the parties . . . waived by not raising the issue before the district court.”
  • recognizing that “the FAA does not itself confer subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Ebel, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.