Tenth Circuit· 11/14/2016
Durkee v. Minor
Citations
- 841 F.3d 872
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20411
- 2016 WL 6677601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying qualified immunity to officer who unshackled inmate in booking area within view of an inmate he 19 had previously threatened
- denying qualified immunity to officer who unshackled inmate in booking area within view of an inmate he had previously threatened
- Despite defendant’s testimony that he did not see plaintiff, a jury could reject defendant’s testimony and infer that he too saw plaintiff because “others [also present] may testify to the surrounding circumstances and what they witnessed.”
- “basic principals [sic] of linear time prevent us from seeing how conduct that occurs after the alleged violation could have somehow caused that violation.” (quoting Cordova v. Aragon, 569 F.3d 1183, 1194 (10th Cir. 2009) (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Baldock, Bachrach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,857×
- Trujillo v. WilliamsTenth Circuit· 2006-10-17· cited 926×
- Dodds v. RichardsonTenth Circuit· 2010-08-06· cited 746×
- Porro v. BarnesTenth Circuit· 2010-11-09· cited 342×
- Cox v. GlanzTenth Circuit· 2015-09-08· cited 342×
- Wilson v. MontanoTenth Circuit· 2013-05-03· cited 248×
- Cordova v. AragonTenth Circuit· 2009-06-17· cited 178×
- Lewis v. TrippTenth Circuit· 2010-05-17· cited 178×
- Lynch v. BarrettTenth Circuit· 2013-01-04· cited 74×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.