Tenth Circuit· 5/17/2010

Lewis v. Tripp

Citations

604 F.3d 1221
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10002
2010 WL 1949030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where the record lacked evi- dence suggesting personal involvement in allegedly unlawful activities in a Section 1983 case was insufficient on summary judgment
explaining that on interlocutory appeal “if a district court concludes that a reasonable jury could find certain specified facts in favor of the plaintiff, the Supreme Court has indicated we usually must take them as true”
“The record before us lacks any evidence suggesting Dr. Tripp’s involvement in any of these ... unlawful activities.”
“If qualified immunity is to mean anything, it must mean that public employees who are just doing their jobs are generally immune from suit.”
“If qualified immunity is to mean anything, it must mean that public employees who are just doing their jobs are generally immune from suit.”
“The problem with th[e district court’s] discussion is that it doesn’t tell us what [the defendant] did or where, when, or why he took any action that might have violated [the plaintiffs] Fourth Amendment rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Chief Judge, Baldock, and Gorsuch, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.