Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/17/1909

Dupree v. Mansur

Citations

  • 214 U.S. 161
  • 29 S. Ct. 548
  • 53 L. Ed. 950
  • 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1901

Syllabus

<p>Where it is established law of a State, as it is of Texas, that when a debt is barred by limitations an action to foreclose a lien or mortgage given as security for it is barred also, the law must be enforced in the courts of the United States, whether sitting in law or in equity.</p> <p>Whether or not the statute of limitation bars a suit to foreclose is a question of substantive law, created by the State and not by the United States, and not one of procedure or jurisdiction; and the Federal court should be governed by the decisions of the State where the land lies. Slide & Spur Mines v. Seymour, 153 U. S. 509.</p> <p>The Federal courts cannot declare it wrong or inequitable for a debtor to rely upon a state statute of limitations, as that would be to declare wrong or discreditable what the legislature of the State declares to be right.</p>

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Dupree v. Mansur

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.