Hale v. Baker & Rice
Citations
- 60 Tex. 217
- 1883 Tex. LEXIS 305
Syllabus
<p>1. Limitation — Vendor’s lien.—A vendor, holding a purchase money note, for the payment of which a vendor’s lien was reserved in the deed, cannot enforce his lien by suit to recover the money after his note is barred by limitation. Still the superior title remains with the vendor, and the vendee cannot obtain absolute title until the purchase money is paid.</p> <p>2. Same.— If the vendor, under such circumstances, regain the possession, he cannot be evicted by trespass to try title, although the purchase money, as a debt, is barred by limitation.</p> <p>3. Same.— If the purchase money note be barred by limitation, and is secured by mortgage or deed of trust, its payment cannot be enforced.</p>
Judges: App, Com, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dunlap's Adm'r v. WrightTexas Supreme Court· 1854-07-01· cited 61×
- Peters v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 58×
- Duty v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court· 1854-07-01· cited 55×
- Perkins v. SterneTexas Supreme Court· 1859-07-01· cited 53×
- Roosevelt v. DavisTexas Supreme Court· 1878-07-01· cited 28×
- Burgess v. MillicanTexas Supreme Court· 1878-07-01· cited 20×
- Ball v. HillTexas Supreme Court· 1878-07-01· cited 18×
- Masterson v. CohenTexas Supreme Court· 1877-07-01· cited 17×
- Heirs of Ross v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court· 1866-12-15· cited 11×
- Rogers v. BlumTexas Supreme Court· 1881-11-22· cited 11×
- Pitschki v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court· 1878-07-01· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.