Skip to main content
· 1/17/2003

Dunkin'Donuts Inc. v. Barr Donut, LLC.

Citations

  • 242 F. Supp. 2d 296
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 783
  • 2003 WL 184017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • non-moving party “may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of [his] pleading”
  • facts deemed admitted because non-moving party did not submit a proper counter-statement of facts and did not include citations to evidence in the statement it did submit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.