Skip to main content
· 9/27/2007

Liles v. New York City Department of Education

Citations

  • 516 F. Supp. 2d 297
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71859
  • 2007 WL 2823076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing ADEA and ADA claims for timeliness within the 300-day period
  • “It is not Defendants’ obligation to track down Plaintiff in order to assure that he receives the COBRA forms that were sent to him.”
  • “[O]nce Plaintiff [, a JROTC instructor,] was decertified by the Army, his termination was a foregone conclusion; indeed, it was required.”
  • “Plaintiff cannot state a claim under COBRA by merely claiming that he did not receive a letter that complied with the relevant notice provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theodore H. Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.