Skip to main content

Dunham v. Dunham

Citations

  • 217 Conn. 24
  • 584 A.2d 445
  • 1991 Conn. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that orders entered pursuant to General Statutes § 52-325d,2 in con- trast to orders entered pursuant to § 52-325b, are not final judgments
  • stating that common- law doctrine of plain error is codified in Practice Book § 4185, now § 60-5
  • stating that common-law doctrine of plain error is codified in Practice Book provision
  • validity of lis pendens “depends entirely on statutory fiat”
  • discussing final judgment under the lis pendens statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Covello, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.