Connecticut Appellate Court· 8/24/1993
Corsino v. Telesca
Citations
- 32 Conn. App. 627
- 630 A.2d 154
- 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 381
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- notice of lis pendens appropriate in any action where outcome of action will in some way, either directly or indirectly, affect title to or interest in real property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-17· cited 694×
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-05-15· cited 164×
- Wall v. ToomeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1884-04-05· cited 109×
- Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-03-15· cited 62×
- Dow & Condon, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-05-19· cited 43×
- Garcia v. Brooks Street AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-08-30· cited 39×
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-01-01· cited 38×
- State v. RumoreConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-07-28· cited 38×
- Goodwin v. PrattConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-05-05· cited 27×
- Village Linc Corp. v. Children's Store, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-06-15· cited 13×
- Sweet v. Sumnerbrook Mill Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-04-10· cited 12×
Other cases named Corsino v. Telesca
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.