Skip to main content

Duncan v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 343 S.E.2d 392
  • 2 Va. App. 342
  • 1986 Va. App. LEXIS 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court has the discretionary authority to reduce, but not increase, the sentence fixed by the jury (citing Code § 19.2-303)
  • stating that “[a] defendant convicted of a felony has an absolute right to have a presentence investigation and report prepared upon his request and submitted to the court prior to the pronouncement of sentence”
  • evidence of mitigating factors is “relevant only to the issue of punishment;” therefore, it is not appropriate “evidence before the jury in mitigation of punishment”
  • evidence of mitigating factors is \relevant only to the issue of punishment;\ therefore, it is not appropriate \evidence before the jury in mitigation of punishment\
  • evidence of mitigating factors \was relevant only to the issue of punishment\ and was not appropriate \evidence before the jury in mitigation of punishment\
  • evidence of mitigating factors “was relevant only to the issue of punishment” and was not appropriate “evidence before the jury in mitigation of punishment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.