Skip to main content

Bassett v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 414 S.E.2d 419
  • 13 Va. App. 580
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 2024
  • 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “trial court’s remark is not, in and of itself, ‘the full context’ simply because it represents the only point at which the court [expressly] addressed the issue [in dispute]”
  • holding that a “trial court’s remark is not, in and of itself, ‘the full context’ simply because it represents the only point at which the court [expressly] addressed the issue [in dispute]”
  • holding that the sentencing judge adequately considered mitigating factors
  • holding that the sentencing judge adequately considered mitigating factors
  • “Barring clear evidence to the contrary, this Court will not presume that a trial court purposefully ignored mitigating factors in blind pursuit of a harsh sentence.”
  • “[b]arring clear evidence to the contrary, this Court will not presume that a trial court purposefully ignored mitigating factors in blind pursuit of a harsh sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bassett v. Commonwealth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.