Federal Claims· 7/8/2009
Dumonde v. United States
Citations
- 87 Fed. Cl. 651
- 2009 U.S. Claims LEXIS 241
- 2009 WL 2005277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “the Constitution has been interpreted as a social contract between the Government and people of the United States,” but holding that the plaintiff’s constitutional claim was “not a contract claim within the meaning of the Tucker Act”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Dumonde v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.