Dumonde v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the Constitution has been interpreted as a social contract between the Government and people of the United States,” but holding that the plaintiff’s constitutional claim was “not a contract claim within the meaning of the Tucker Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Krukowski v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-12-02· cited 5×
• Kaetz v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2022-04-12

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Haines v. Kerner
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
• United States v. Testan
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 3,918×
• Hughes v. Rowe
  Supreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 3,527×
• United States v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 2,169×
• Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service
  Federal Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 1,960×
• Trauma Service Group v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1997-01-16· cited 518×
• City of El Centro v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1990-12-28· cited 333×
• Scogin v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1995-04-14· cited 159×
• Felix E. Perez v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 140×
• Thermalon Industries, Ltd. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1995-11-06· cited 40×
• Montalvo v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1982-09-10· cited 38×
• Leonardo v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-01-24· cited 22×
• Bounds v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1983-01-07· cited 17×
• Sumner v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-06-23· cited 13×

Other cases named Dumonde v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• DuMonde v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-08
• DuMonde v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-08