Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 12/29/1995
Dumas v. State
Citations
- 675 So. 2d 87
- 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 406
- 1995 WL 774477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the state prisoner did not possess a state-created liberty interest in telephone, canteen, or visitation privileges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McConico v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-04-30· cited 14×
- Austin v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-04-27· cited 7×
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-08-26· cited 6×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-01-17· cited 4×
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-03-06· cited 3×
- Jemison v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-05-12
- Parker v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-03-02
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,564×
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 1,320×
- Summerford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-02-12· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.