Eleventh Circuit· 10/29/1993
Duke v. Cleland
Citations
- 5 F.3d 1399
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28019
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating dismissal of ballot-regulation challenge and remanding for further proceedings because “[d]iscovery has not commenced” and “[t]he existence of a state interest . . . is a matter of proof”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McKusick v. City of Melbourne, FLEleventh Circuit· 1996-09-27· cited 72×
- LaRouche, Lyndon H. v. Fowler, Donald L.D.C. Circuit· 1998-08-28· cited 55×
- Emidio Soltysik v. Alex PadillaNinth Circuit· 2018-12-03· cited 47×
- Gottlieb v. Federal Election CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1998-05-22· cited 39×
- Duke v. MasseyEleventh Circuit· 1996-07-11· cited 31×
- Edwards v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsM.D. Alabama· 2000-01-14· cited 18×
- Libertarian Party of Washington v. MunroNinth Circuit· 1994-07-14· cited 12×
- Morrow v. Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C.M.D. Alabama· 2005-02-11· cited 10×
- Whitson v. Staff Acquisition, Inc.M.D. Alabama· 1999-01-27· cited 9×
- Leverette v. Alabama Revenue DepartmentM.D. Alabama· 2006-09-25· cited 8×
- Helton v. HawkinsM.D. Alabama· 1998-07-15· cited 6×
- Scott v. EstesM.D. Alabama· 1999-08-04· cited 6×
- Ortega v. BrockM.D. Alabama· 2007-08-07· cited 4×
- Nichols v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.M.D. Florida· 1997-03-21· cited 3×
- Wallace v. JacksonM.D. Alabama· 2009-09-28· cited 1×
- Mahmud v. ObermanN.D. Georgia· 2007-06-19· cited 1×
- Bentley v. CSX Transportation, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2006-06-26· cited 1×
- Davis v. Monroe Cty. Board of Ed.Eleventh Circuit· 1996-02-14
- Murphy v. FranklinM.D. Alabama· 2007-03-28
- BMC-The Benchmark Management Co. v. Ceebraid-Signal Corp.N.D. Georgia· 2007-06-13
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 7,676×
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 6,693×
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 2,650×
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 1,828×
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,446×
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 1,395×
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,313×
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 875×
- Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 844×
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 706×
- Evans v. NewtonSupreme Court· 1966-01-18· cited 660×
- Terry v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1953-06-15· cited 629×
- Tashjian v. Republican Party of ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 602×
- Norman v. ReedSupreme Court· 1992-01-14· cited 538×
- Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. La FolletteSupreme Court· 1981-02-25· cited 288×
- Nixon v. CondonSupreme Court· 1932-05-02· cited 274×
- Linder v. PortocarreroEleventh Circuit· 1992-06-17· cited 201×
- David C. Jackam and Susanne Jackam v. Hospital Corporation of America Mideast, Ltd. And Hospital Corporation of AmericaEleventh Circuit· 1986-10-08· cited 134×
- Duke v. ClelandEleventh Circuit· 1993-10-29· cited 133×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.