Skip to main content
· 6/27/1995

Duchscherer v. W.W. Wallwork, Inc.

Citations

  • 534 N.W.2d 13
  • 1995 N.D. LEXIS 116
  • 1995 WL 380895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying lodestar procedure to award attorneys fees under federal law for violation of odometer disclosure requirement
  • “The rate and hours expended by opposing counsel are often probative of the reasonableness of attorney fees for prevailing counsel.”
  • where claims of deceit and odometer fraud were related and shared common core of facts and related legal theories, claims were not separable for purpose of awarding attorney’s fees under Federal Odometer Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meschke, Vande Walle, Levine, Neumann, Sandstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.