Troutman v. Pierce, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding ‘[A] prevailing consumer’s attorney-fee award under the Magnuson-Moss Act at the trial level should [not] be dissipated by uncompensated costs, expenses and attorney fees in successfully defending a judgment on appeal.’
• holding “[A] prevailing consumer’s attorney-fee award under the Magnuson-Moss Act at the trial level should [not] be dissipated by uncompensated costs, expenses and attorney fees in successfully defending a judgment on appeal.”
• “We do not believe that a prevailing consumer’s attorney-fee award under the Magnuson-Moss Act at the trial level should be dissipated by uncompensated costs, expenses and attorney fees in successfully defending a judgment on appeal”
• “We do not believe that a prevailing consumer’s attorney-fee award under [the Act] at the trial level should be dissipated by uncompensated costs, expenses and attorney fees in successfully defending a judgment on appeal.”
• remanding for determination of reasonable appellate attorney fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).