Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 1/4/1990

DuBose v. Minnesota

Citations

  • 893 F.2d 169
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 109
  • 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,542
  • 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding no merger of interlocutory orders because “failure to prosecute a claim should carry no . . . reward”
  • explaining earlier grant of summary judgment did not merge into later dismissal under Rule 41(b) and, therefore, was unreviewable on appeal
  • plaintiff's failure to comply with numerous pretrial orders and failure to appear for trial justified dismissal with prejudice
  • pro se plaintiff’s claims properly dismissed for failure to appear at trial and prosecute case
  • “[D]ismissal for failure to prosecute bars review of earlier entered interlocutory rulings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Fagg, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.