Al-Torki v. Kaempen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal for failure to prosecute “forfeits a litigant’s right to appeal interlocutory orders prior to judgment”
• holding that interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute, whether the failure to prosecute is purposeful or a result of negligence or mistake
• holding that interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute
• holding that interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2
• holding that where dismissal was a sanction, interlocutory orders are not appealable
• holding interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Omstead v. Dell, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-02-05· cited 262×
• Lewis v. Rawson
  Second Circuit· 2009-04-28· cited 229×
• Hearns v. San Bernardino Police Department
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-01· cited 219×
• John's Insulation, Inc. v. L. Addison & Associates, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1998-09-14· cited 90×
• John Bethel v. McAllister Brothers, Inc. Frank J. Huesser Thomas Bethel, as Administrator of the Estate of John Bethel
  Third Circuit· 1996-04-17· cited 85×
• James Brown v. Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hosp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-11-04· cited 51×
• In re George
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-03-06· cited 36×
• Rollins v. Superior Court of Los Angeles
  C.D. California· 2010-03-23· cited 20×
• Lee v. Roessler-Lobert (In Re Roessler-Lobert)
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-05-15· cited 18×
• James v. Madison Street Jail
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-25· cited 17×
• Marino v. Classic Auto Refinishing, Inc. (In Re Marino)
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-10-22· cited 8×
• George v. City of Morro Bay (In re George)
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-08-15· cited 3×
• Beard-Williams v. Palmdale School District
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-04-24· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-03-05· cited 1×
• Benoist v. Fast Draw Productions Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-02-21· cited 1×
• 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5905, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9497
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-25
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-08-15
• Michael Omstead v. Dell, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-02-05
• In re: Carey A. Roessler-Lobert
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-05-15
• Norman v. San Jose Municipal Court
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-24

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Link v. Wabash Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 14,398×
• Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-11-23· cited 4,024×
• Henderson v. Duncan
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-01-07· cited 3,439×
• Hiram Ash v. Eugene Cvetkov
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-08-06· cited 713×
• Meadows v. Dominican Republic
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-05-14· cited 183×
• Britton v. Co-Op Banking Group
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-10-11· cited 41×
• National Polymer Products, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 1981-09-14· cited 40×
• James E. Deas and Peterbilt of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. Paccar, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-11-14· cited 34×
• DuBose v. Minnesota
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-01-04· cited 28×
• Roy v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-02-16· cited 27×
• Cassidy v. Tenorio
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-09-12· cited 26×
• Roy v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-12-17· cited 6×
• William Carl Cunningham Et Ux., and Glenn A. Price Et Ux. v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1961-10-17· cited 5×