Al-Torki v. Kaempen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal for failure to prosecute “forfeits a litigant’s right to appeal interlocutory orders prior to judgment”
• holding that interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute, whether the failure to prosecute is purposeful or a result of negligence or mistake
• holding that interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute
• holding that interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2
• holding that where dismissal was a sanction, interlocutory orders are not appealable
• holding interlocutory orders are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).