Federal Claims· 3/31/1999
Dubinsky v. United States
Citations
- 43 Fed. Cl. 243
- 43 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,447
- 1999 U.S. Claims LEXIS 57
- 1999 WL 185058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The court notes that an agency may consider information in its possession relevant to an offeror’s proposal; this is an exception to the general rule that an agency may only look within the four corners of a proposal when it is evaluating a proposal.”
- analyzing “improper discussions” under FAR § 15.307(b)
- “This provision [48 C.F.R. § 52.212-l(f
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruggink
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2003-05-09· cited 201×
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2001-02-15· cited 146×
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2003-12-03· cited 114×
- Information Technology & Applications Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2001-12-28· cited 112×
- Bean Stuyvesant, L.L.C. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2000-12-01· cited 57×
- NEQ, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-08-10· cited 50×
- Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2021-03-04· cited 48×
- D & S Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-10-14· cited 44×
- L-3 Communications Eotech, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-09-23· cited 43×
- PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2006-05-26· cited 42×
- ACRA, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1999-07-14· cited 37×
- Seaborn Health Care, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2003-03-11· cited 32×
- Red River Holdings, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-07-17· cited 25×
- Gulf Group, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2003-01-14· cited 24×
- Metropolitan Van & Storage, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-04-16· cited 24×
- Input/Output Technology, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1999-06-11· cited 23×
- Electronic Data System, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-05-13· cited 23×
- UnitedHealth Military & Veterans Services, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2017-05-30· cited 23×
- Biospherics, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2000-10-17· cited 20×
- Conscoop-Consorzia Fra Cooperative Di Prod. E Lavoro v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2004-08-13· cited 20×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1996-12-19· cited 356×
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1974-02-20· cited 299×
- Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1988-10-14· cited 296×
- Burroughs Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1980-03-19· cited 201×
- Caci Field Services, Inc. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1988-08-11· cited 167×
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1996-11-07· cited 103×
- Analytical & Research Technology, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1997-08-08· cited 96×
- Data General Corp. v. JohnsonFederal Circuit· 1996-02-29· cited 94×
- CACI Field Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1987-11-23· cited 88×
- Labat-Anderson, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1999-01-29· cited 62×
- General Engineering & MacHine Works v. Sean C. O'keefe, Acting Secretary of the NavyFederal Circuit· 1993-04-16· cited 45×
- Prudential-Maryland Joint Venture Co. v. LehmanDistrict of Columbia· 1984-06-05· cited 8×
- Lyons Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1997-09-16· cited 7×
- R.R. Donnelley & Sons, Co. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-01-30· cited 7×
Other cases named Dubinsky v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.