Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has rejected the reasoning of the Tomcello plurality
• noting that “Torncello applies only when the Government enters a contract with no intention of fulfilling its promises”
• noting that “[a]fter World War I, the government terminated contracts in large numbers”
• justifying the adoption of a bad faith standard in federal termination for convenience cases in light of specific procurement laws and policies adopted by the federal government
• “The contractor’s burden to prove the Government acted in bad faith, however, is very weighty.”
• “Termination for convenience damages include “costs of performance prior to termination, profits on that performance and termination costs. No anticipatory profits are to be awarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).