Skip to main content
· 2/10/2010

Dubinsky v. MERMART, LLC

Citations

  • 595 F.3d 812
  • 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20044
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2734
  • 2010 WL 445725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a claim for unjust enrichment and noting the plaintiffs alleged alternative theory “seeks recovery for events arising solely out of the [contract]”
  • dismissing a claim for unjust enrichment and noting the plaintiffs alleged alternative theory “seeks recovery for events arising solely out of the [contract]”
  • requiring a court to “enforce a contract as written and 5 Under Section 1(E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gruender, Shepherd, Jarvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.