Skip to main content
· 7/17/2008

Cole v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

Citations

  • 533 F.3d 932
  • 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2393
  • 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2710
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15197
  • 2008 WL 2756943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the factors that indicate “whether a plan has the requisite administrative scheme to qualify as an ERISA . . . plan”
  • “[A] party cannot assert arguments that were not presented to the district court in opposing summary judgment in an appeal contesting an adverse grant of summary judgment”
  • “[A] party cannot assert arguments that were not presented to the district court in opposing summary judgment in an appeal contesting an adverse grant of summary judgment.”
  • relief for plain error is generally only available to prevent a miscarriage of justice
  • applying only a “narrow exception” to established preservation rule
  • applying only a \narrow exception\ to established preservation rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Melloy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.