· 7/17/2008
Cole v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
Citations
- 533 F.3d 932
- 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2393
- 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2710
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15197
- 2008 WL 2756943
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the factors that indicate “whether a plan has the requisite administrative scheme to qualify as an ERISA . . . plan”
- “[A] party cannot assert arguments that were not presented to the district court in opposing summary judgment in an appeal contesting an adverse grant of summary judgment”
- “[A] party cannot assert arguments that were not presented to the district court in opposing summary judgment in an appeal contesting an adverse grant of summary judgment.”
- relief for plain error is generally only available to prevent a miscarriage of justice
- applying only a “narrow exception” to established preservation rule
- applying only a \narrow exception\ to established preservation rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Melloy, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.