Skip to main content
W.D. Pennsylvania· 5/12/1975

Droback v. United States

Citations

  • 421 U.S. 964
  • 95 S. Ct. 1952
  • 44 L. Ed. 2d 450
  • 1975 U.S. LEXIS 1566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • witness's statements about airplane crash, even though given in confidentiality to safety investigators, were not exempt because not commercial or financial information
  • organization’s authority to make final decisions is indicative of government-controlled, FOIA agency status, although “each arrangement must be examined anew and in its own context”
  • joinder under Rule 8(a) permissible where mail fraud charges and tax evasion charges all were connected with the defendant's use of his public office for private gain
  • joinder under Rule 8(a) permissible where mail fraud charges and tax evasion charges all were connected with the defendant’s use of his public office for private gain
  • defendant’s consultation of lawyer regarding tax returns purges taint of illegal search, allowing illegally seized evidence to be used in criminal prosecution for tax fraud committed after search
  • defendant's consultation of lawyer regarding tax returns purges taint of illegal search, allowing illegally seized evidence to be used in criminal prosecution for tax fraud committed after search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

121 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Droback v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.