Drews v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on the \right for any reason rule\ in concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded evidence at trial
• relying on the “right for any reason rule” in concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded evidence at trial
• we need not “explore existential questions” of admissibility when evidence is inadmissible for another reason
• proffer made at motion for new trial hearing constituted inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-02-18· cited 38×
• State v. Mondor
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-28· cited 33×
• Tyson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-10-05· cited 8×
• Byron v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-03-05· cited 6×
• Justin Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-03-16
• State v. MONDOR (And Vice Versa)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-28
• Mikal Snow Mitchell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-06-09
• Kerry Dwight Albright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-03-13

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Malcolm v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
• Wright v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-05· cited 210×
• Pruitt v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-05-14· cited 124×
• Parks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-11-30· cited 65×
• Domingues v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-11-17· cited 60×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-30· cited 18×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-06-28· cited 16×