Doyle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “tampering” with lottery equipment consists of “meddling with lottery machines in a way that subverts [the machine’s] process [of issuing tickets in exchange for money]”
• although defendant did not physically alter lottery ticket dispenser, he was properly found guilty of tampering with lottery equipment where he frustrated purpose of lottery ticket dispenser to issue tickets in exchange for money (and to generate revenue for the State of Texas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maynard v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-05-26· cited 32×
• Doe v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-03-05· cited 7×
• Smith v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-03-23
• William Maynard v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-05-26
• Paul Earl Dorsey v. Gary L. Johnson
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-03-17
• Cody Michael Smith v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-03-23

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-09· cited 6,445×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-12-18· cited 2,034×
• Boykin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
• Neal v. Clark
  Supreme Court· 1878-02-18· cited 399×
• Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1923-04-09· cited 154×
• Howlett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-09· cited 91×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-27· cited 44×
• Robertson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1994-08-16· cited 19×
• Edmondson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-13· cited 10×