Idaho Court of Appeals· 5/6/1999
Downing v. State
Citations
- 979 P.2d 1219
- 132 Idaho 861
- 1999 Ida. App. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding defective notice of intent to dismiss case affected substantial right to respond to notice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perry, Lansing, Schwartzman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1994-02-25· cited 471×
- Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-03-31· cited 392×
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-04-27· cited 358×
- Baruth v. GardnerIdaho Court of Appeals· 1986-02-20· cited 322×
- Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1990-07-03· cited 216×
- Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1969-03-17· cited 183×
- Gonzales v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-11-01· cited 99×
- Ramirez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1987-07-30· cited 92×
- Hoover v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1988-05-04· cited 73×
- State v. DowningIdaho Court of Appeals· 1996-02-12· cited 10×
- Banks v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-06-09· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.