Douglas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t appears that the Court may have simply concluded that Ibanez was ‘not a disclaimer case,’ and therefore focussed [sic] its attention on the lack of proof in the record.”
• “[I]t appears that the Court may have simply concluded that Ibanez was ‘not a disclaimer case,’ and therefore focussed [sic] its attention on the lack of proof in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Walker v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-02-20· cited 10×
• Ted F. Walker v. The Board of Professional
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-02-20

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,526×
• Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 2,355×
• Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 809×
• Bigelow v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 767×
• Edenfield v. Fane
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 677×
• In re R. M. J.
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 466×
• In Re RMJ
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 400×
• Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 196×
• Ibanez v. Florida Dept. of Business and Professional Regulation, Bd. of Accountancy
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-13· cited 184×
• Barnes v. Walker
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1950-10-09· cited 35×
• H & L MESSENGERS, INC. v. City of Brentwood
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1979-02-12· cited 22×
• Monday v. Millsaps
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1954-05-21· cited 18×
• Texas Association of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1986-05-27· cited 8×