Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/7/2000
Douglas v. State
Citations
- 747 A.2d 752
- 130 Md. App. 666
- 2000 Md. App. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming condition of supervised probation prohibiting contact in person, by telephone, or by mail with mother of defendant’s children because defendant was allowed contact through an intermediary to effect visitation with children
- “When there is a conflict between the transcript and the commitment record, unless it is shown that the transcript is in error, the transcript prevails.”
- upholding the condition without discussion of fundamental parental rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander, Eyler, Thieme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DanaherSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-11-20· cited 28×
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-30· cited 10×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 7×
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-26· cited 7×
- Potts v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-28· cited 7×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-12· cited 6×
- In re: S.F.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-02-03· cited 6×
- Dutton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-08· cited 2×
- In re: S.F.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-01-28· cited 1×
- (2007)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2007-06-14
- State v. MaherNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2026-02-12
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 204×
- Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
- Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-12-04· cited 115×
- State v. DopkowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-11· cited 49×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-28· cited 41×
- Dedo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-07-31· cited 34×
- Watson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-03-09· cited 25×
- Nitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-11-27· cited 23×
- Hudgins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-05· cited 23×
- Passamichali v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-13· cited 17×
- Saenz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-25· cited 12×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-09-28· cited 11×
- Sheppard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-12· cited 10×
- Dedo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-29· cited 8×
- Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.