D.C. Circuit· 3/7/1989
Dougherty v. Barry
Citations
- 869 F.2d 605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that members of the Department were entitled to monetary relief under Section 1981
- holding the “statutory language and structure contemplate that the [EEOC] will issue right to sue notices in cases involving a governmental unit when it does not find probable cause”
- observing that “ [c]ourts have tended to interpret Title VII as laying th[e] responsibility [for issuing right- to-sue notices in cases involving governmental entities] at the Attorney General’s door”
- indicating that where a party has established a basis for equitable tolling, such as inadequate notice, the lack of prejudice to the opposing party is an equitable factor that is appropriate for consideration in deciding whether to toll the limitations period
- suggesting equitable tolling could be warranted when either the court or agency misleads the plaintiff
- “[I]n unambiguous language, the right to sue notice declared that failure to sue within that time period would result in forfeiture of [appellees’] cause of action.’” (second alteration in original) (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2008-03-10· cited 258×
- Tyquisha M. Stamper v. Duval County School BoardEleventh Circuit· 2017-07-18· cited 58×
- Bartlette v. Hyatt RegencyDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-25· cited 21×
- United States v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 2011-07-08· cited 21×
- Hiller v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Used Motor Vehicle & Parts CommissionTenth Circuit· 2003-05-06· cited 15×
- Redding v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-12-15· cited 10×
- Obaseki v. Fannie MaeDistrict of Columbia· 2012-01-17· cited 8×
- Davis v. VilsackDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-01· cited 7×
- United States v. City of MiamiEleventh Circuit· 1999-11-17
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-08-21
- McGee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2010-07-15
- Albright v. City of New OrleansE.D. Louisiana· 2002-01-24
- Graves v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-04-14
- Proposed Change in EEOC Regulations Concerning Right-to-Sue Notices for Public Sector EmployeesOffice of Legal Counsel· 1999-10-07
- Jackson-Pringle v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2022-07-28
- Ferrell v. FudgeDistrict of Columbia· 2023-02-16
- Alston v. BetheaDistrict of Columbia· 2023-06-27
- Jefferson v. AustinDistrict of Columbia· 2024-08-27
- Employee 1 v. Department of Behavioral HealthDistrict of Columbia· 2024-09-29
- Ayo-Aghimien II v. Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2025-02-05
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 3,317×
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-05-19· cited 2,546×
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 1,479×
- Henry W. Segar v. William French Smith, Attorney General, Henry W. Segar, Cross-Appellants v. William French Smith, Attorney GeneralD.C. Circuit· 1984-06-26· cited 275×
- Herman GONZALEZ, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1980-01-21· cited 195×
- Thompson v. SawyerD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-27· cited 180×
- Diane FOUCHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the JEKYLL ISLAND-STATE PARK AUTHORITY, Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1983-09-09· cited 137×
- Dorothy L. Milton v. Casper Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1982-12-20· cited 129×
- Nicu J. Rozen, M.D. v. District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1983-03-25· cited 54×
- Donald R. CLEVELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, AKA McDonnell-Douglas Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1975-01-29· cited 53×
- Dougherty v. BarryD.C. Circuit· 1989-03-07· cited 36×
- Dorothy L. Hendrix v. Memorial Hospital of Galveston CountyFifth Circuit· 1985-11-19· cited 23×
- Lucius T. SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. Hugh HARDISON, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesEleventh Circuit· 1985-01-10· cited 22×
- Sharon LUTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SINGER COMPANY, Kearfott Division, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1982-06-04· cited 19×
- Dougherty v. BarryDistrict of Columbia· 1985-04-30· cited 11×
- Sharon LUTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SINGER COMPANY, KEARFOTT DIVISION, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1983-01-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.