Skip to main content

Dorsey v. State

Citations

  • 357 N.E.2d 280
  • 171 Ind. App. 408
  • 1976 Ind. App. LEXIS 1104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant's request for counsel subsequent to request to proceed pro se and acquiescence in proceedings renders moot the issue of whether the trial court erred in denying defendant the right to represent himself at trial
  • removal and remand of state criminal prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.