Skip to main content

Dooley v. State

Citations

  • 743 So. 2d 65
  • 1999 WL 641810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant's statement that he did not wish to waive his rights \certainly qualifies as an indication that he did not want to be interrogated\
  • explaining that when interrogations are recorded, the appellate court is permitted to review the recordings to ascertain the legal sufficiency of the trial court’s ruling
  • “Insofar as a ruling is based on an audio or videotape, the trial court is in no better position to evaluate such evidence than the appellate court, which may review the tape for facts legally sufficient to support the trial court’s ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hazouri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.