Donaldson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court violated defendant’s right against self-incrimination by considering defendant’s protestations of innocence and lack of remorse in sentencing
• holding that the trial court violated defendant's right against self-incrimination by considering defendant's protestations of innocence and lack of remorse in sentencing
• holding that the trial court violated defendant’s right against self-incrimination by considering defendant's protestations of innocence and lack of remorse in sentencing
• “[A]t sentencing the trial court expressly considered [the defendant’s] protestations of innocence and failure to show remorse in determining what sentence to impose. In so doing, the trial court violated [the defendant’s] due process right against self-incrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peters v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-20· cited 24×
• Whitmore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-03· cited 23×
• Johnathan Kenneth Ray Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-22· cited 11×
• German v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-27· cited 4×
• Allen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-01-04· cited 4×
• Holt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-28· cited 3×
• ELCIN SIBRUN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-09-30
• Alvin Davis v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2021-12-02