Doherty v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where appellant challenges a non-constitutional error, the Criminal Appeals Reform Act requires that he demonstrate that there is a \reasonable possibility\ that the error affected the verdict
• gang membership not relevant because not admitted to impeach witness but rather to show defendant’s propensity to commit crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reyes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-28· cited 10×
• Mann v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25· cited 6×
• Berkowitz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-25· cited 4×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-16· cited 2×
• Nagel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-11· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Fahy v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 1,743×
• Goodwin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-24· cited 16×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-20· cited 11×
• Mason v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-24· cited 9×