C.D. California· 8/5/1999
Doe v. Unocal Corp.
Citations
- 67 F. Supp. 2d 1140
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19507
- 1999 WL 819698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Standing is a jurisdictional element that must be satisfied prior to class certification.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2002-09-18· cited 33×
- Cholakyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCC.D. California· 2012-03-28· cited 29×
- Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc.S.D. New York· 2005-03-25· cited 27×
- In re Eaton Vance Corp. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2004-04-01· cited 21×
- Does I Through III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2003-06-18· cited 10×
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2002-09-18· cited 9×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 3,786×
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 3,605×
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court· 1974-01-15· cited 3,578×
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 776×
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 702×
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 1996-05-20· cited 662×
- Smith v. City of FontanaNinth Circuit· 1987-01-06· cited 265×
- Julie Ann Giles v. Richard (Dick) J. Ackerman, Sheriff of Bonneville CountyNinth Circuit· 1984-11-02· cited 180×
- Ronald O. Nelsen Michael Bullene v. King CountyNinth Circuit· 1990-02-09· cited 113×
- Raul Gonzales v. The City of PeoriaNinth Circuit· 1983-12-16· cited 105×
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.C.D. California· 1998-11-18· cited 32×
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.C.D. California· 1997-04-24· cited 25×
- Nava v. City of DublinNinth Circuit· 1997-07-28· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.