Sixth Circuit· 2/11/1997
Doe v. Sundquist
Citations
- 106 F.3d 702
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that a district court should decline supplemental jurisdiction where “[c]oncerns of comity” exist that support allowing state courts to decide “purely state law issues”
- reasoning that a district court should decline supplemental jurisdiction where there are novel issues of state constitutional law and “[c]oncerns of comity” support allowing state courts to decide “purely state law issues”
- “[W]e have observed that the degree of likelihood -9- No. 18-3325, Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC, v. City of Green, Ohio, et al. of success that need be shown to support a preliminary injunction varies inversely with the degree of injury the plaintiff might suffer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Solantic, LLC v. City of Neptune BeachEleventh Circuit· 2005-05-31· cited 131×
- James Hunter v. Page County, IowaEighth Circuit· 2024-05-17· cited 27×
- DOES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, AND 7 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-29· cited 16×
- In the Interest of R.D. R.D.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-03-11· cited 5×
- Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.Federal Circuit· 2024-10-24· cited 3×
- Field v. MichiganE.D. Michigan· 2003-03-28· cited 2×
- Robert C. Touchston v. Michael McDermottEleventh Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 1×
- Amended May 27, 2016 in the Interest of R.D. R.D.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-03-11
- Hunter Doster v. Frank KendallSixth Circuit· 2022-11-29
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,492×
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 1,722×
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSupreme Court· 1986-06-11· cited 526×
- Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Sixth Circuit· 1982-05-26· cited 319×
- J. P., M. R., Cross-Appellees v. Andrew J. Desanti, Cross-AppellantsSixth Circuit· 1981-07-15· cited 195×
- Davis v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court· 1992-06-01· cited 138×
- John Doe v. John T. WiggintonSixth Circuit· 1994-04-19· cited 132×
- Christian Schmidt Brewing Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.Sixth Circuit· 1985-01-17· cited 91×
- Glenn Allen v. Diebold, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1994-09-06· cited 77×
- Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. FisherSixth Circuit· 1995-11-16· cited 64×
- Campbell v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-01-26· cited 59×
- Don Tate v. Richard Frey, Defendants-Third Party Commonwealth of Kentucky, Third PartyThird Circuit· 1984-06-01· cited 48×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Senex Corporation, A. J. Jolly and the Mentor CorporationSixth Circuit· 1976-05-07· cited 42×
- Doe v. SundquistSixth Circuit· 1997-02-11· cited 30×
- Illinois Council On Long Term Care v. BradleySeventh Circuit· 1992-02-18· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.