J. P., M. R., Cross-Appellees v. Andrew J. Desanti, Cross-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the disclosure of juveniles’ records to juvenile court personnel did not implicate the plaintiffs’ fundamental rights
• holding that the disclosure of juveniles’ records to juvenile court personnel did not implicate the plaintiffs’ fundamental rights
• concluding that the Constitution does not encompass a general right to nondisclosure of confidential infbrmation contained in juvenile court records
• concluding that “even minimal interference with a pending state proceeding” requires abstention
• finding that no right of confidentiality exists under the federal constitution
• “Inferring very broad ‘constitutional’ rights where the Constitution itself does not express them is an activity not appropriate to the judiciary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).