Doe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s decision to sustain the peremptory strike because “defense counsel did not challenge the facts on which the strikes were based and thus failed to preserve this issue for appellate review”
• affirming the trial court’s decision to sustain the peremptory strike because “[d]efense counsel did not challenge the facts on which the strikes were based and thus failed to preserve this issue for appellate review”
• affirming the trial court’s decision to sustain the peremptory strike because “[d]efense counsel did not challenge the facts on which the strikes were based and thus failed to preserve this issue for appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Denis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-30· cited 8×
• GEOVANI JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-19· cited 3×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-12
• GEOVANI JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Melbourne v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-05· cited 356×
• Rimmer v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-07-03· cited 92×
• Hoskins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-19· cited 80×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19· cited 17×
• Soto v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-15· cited 11×
• Shuler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 8×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-02· cited 1×
• Fleming v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-07· cited 1×