Piselli v. 75th Street Medical

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that both the three- and five-year statutory periods must be tolled during a plaintiffs minority
• holding that both the three- and five-year statutory periods must be tolled during a plaintiff’s minority
• holding unconstitutional in a medical malpractice suit a statute of limitations which provided that the limitations period began to run before the minor attained the age of majority
• observing that Article 19 “generally prohibits unreasonable restrictions upon traditional remedies or access to the courts” (emphasis added)
• stating that “we have held that Article 19 does not require the recognition of a new tort cause of action which has never previously been recognized in Maryland”
• disregarding assertion that injury was discovered earlier than stated in the certification order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).